Title: History of Korean Evaluator: Seungyeon Lee Date: November 29, 2016 • Topic Selection: _o_Facilitated vocal variety __Satisfactory __Could Improve • Volume: _ o__Excellent _ _Satisfactory __Too loud or soft • Rate: _o__Excellent, varied _ _Satisfactory __Too fast or too slow • Pitch: __Varied conversational _o_Satisfactory __Monotonous, artificial • Quality: _o_Pleasant, friendly __Satisfactory __Harsh, monotonous • Pauses: _o_Appropriate, effective __Satisfactory __Could Improve • Expressiveness: _o_Conveyed emotion, meaning __Satisfactory __Could Improve • Vocal Variety: _o_Enhanced speech __Satisfactory __Could Improve • Organization: _o_Logical flow of ideas __Satisfactory __Should Improve • Word Usage: __Vivid, descriptive, accurate _o_Satisfactory __Could Improve • Body Language: __Natural, expressive _o_Satisfactory __Unnatural, distracting
• What could the speaker have done differently to make the speech more effective? It would have been better if she had used more natural hand gestures while presenting, and try to have eye contacts more naturally with the audiences. Moreover, It would have helped the presentation if she had more facial expresssions.
• What did you like about the speech? I liked the way she tries to explain the difficult topic in easier way with expressive gestures. Furthermore, her PPT was visible because she used big pictures and not many words. her voice was also loud enough to understand what she is saying. In total, I think her presentation got much better than the previous one.
Title: History of Korean
ReplyDeleteEvaluator: Seungyeon Lee
Date: November 29, 2016
• Topic Selection: _o_Facilitated vocal variety __Satisfactory __Could Improve
• Volume: _ o__Excellent _ _Satisfactory __Too loud or soft
• Rate: _o__Excellent, varied _ _Satisfactory __Too fast or too slow
• Pitch: __Varied conversational _o_Satisfactory __Monotonous, artificial
• Quality: _o_Pleasant, friendly __Satisfactory __Harsh, monotonous
• Pauses: _o_Appropriate, effective __Satisfactory __Could Improve
• Expressiveness: _o_Conveyed emotion, meaning __Satisfactory __Could Improve
• Vocal Variety: _o_Enhanced speech __Satisfactory __Could Improve
• Organization: _o_Logical flow of ideas __Satisfactory __Should Improve
• Word Usage: __Vivid, descriptive, accurate _o_Satisfactory __Could Improve
• Body Language: __Natural, expressive _o_Satisfactory __Unnatural, distracting
• What could the speaker have done differently to make the speech more effective?
It would have been better if she had used more natural hand gestures while presenting, and try to have eye contacts more naturally with the audiences. Moreover, It would have helped the presentation if she had more facial expresssions.
• What did you like about the speech?
I liked the way she tries to explain the difficult topic in easier way with expressive gestures. Furthermore, her PPT was visible because she used big pictures and not many words. her voice was also loud enough to understand what she is saying. In total, I think her presentation got much better than the previous one.