Title: Behavioral Economics Evaluator: Youngho Chun Date: November 28, 2016
• Topic Selection: __Facilitated vocal variety _o_Satisfactory __Could Improve • Volume: _o_Excellent __Satisfactory __Too loud or soft • Rate: _o_Excellent, varied __Satisfactory __Too fast or too slow • Pitch: __Varied conversational _o_Satisfactory __Monotonous, artificial • Quality: _o_Pleasant, friendly __Satisfactory __Harsh, monotonous • Pauses: _o_Appropriate, effective __Satisfactory __Could Improve • Expressiveness: __Conveyed emotion, meaning _ o _Satisfactory __Could Improve • Vocal Variety: _o_Enhanced speech __Satisfactory __Could Improve • Organization: _o_Logical flow of ideas __Satisfactory __Should Improve • Word Usage: _o_Vivid, descriptive, accurate __Satisfactory __Could Improve • Body Language: __Natural, expressive _o_Satisfactory __Unnatural, distracting
• What could the speaker have done differently to make the speech more effective? It would be great if he used more clear visual aids. He used some but it was a little bit boring. Although it contributed to further understanding.
• What did you like about the speech? I like his material for speech. Some may think it is boring but for me it was beneficial and interesting. By using dramatic visual aids, he can enhance his delivery.
Title: Behavioral Economics Evaluator: Jisu Kim Date: November 29, 2016 • Topic Selection: __Facilitated vocal variety _o_Satisfactory __Could Improve • Volume: _o __Excellent _ _Satisfactory __Too loud or soft • Rate: ___Excellent, varied _o_Satisfactory __Too fast or too slow • Pitch: __Varied conversational _o_Satisfactory __Monotonous, artificial • Quality: _o_Pleasant, friendly __Satisfactory __Harsh, monotonous • Pauses: _o_Appropriate, effective __Satisfactory __Could Improve • Expressiveness: __Conveyed emotion, meaning _o_Satisfactory __Could Improve • Vocal Variety: _o_Enhanced speech __Satisfactory __Could Improve • Organization: _o_Logical flow of ideas __Satisfactory __Should Improve • Word Usage: _o_Vivid, descriptive, accurate __Satisfactory __Could Improve • Body Language: __Natural, expressive _o_Satisfactory __Unnatural, distracting
• What could the speaker have done differently to make the speech more effective? :I think it would be more better if he used more readable visual data. Fonts of characters and size of images were little bit small to read.
• What did you like about the speech? I think his topic of speech was really good. Behavioral Economics is really interesting field in Economics and also an interesting subject in speech. Lastly, he emphasized why Behavioral Economics is important by showing the way of analysis by traditional Economics in the early phase. I think it was helpful to understand why his topic is important and special.
Title : Behavioral Economics Evaluator : Do Hyun Lim Date : 16.12.02
• Topic Selection: _o_Facilitated vocal variety __Satisfactory __Could Improve • Volume: _o_Excellent __Satisfactory __Too loud or soft • Rate: _o_Excellent, varied __Satisfactory __Too fast or too slow • Pitch: __Varied conversational _o_Satisfactory __Monotonous, artificial • Quality: _o_Pleasant, friendly __Satisfactory __Harsh, monotonous • Pauses: __Appropriate, effective _o_Satisfactory __Could Improve • Expressiveness: __Conveyed emotion, meaning _o_Satisfactory __Could Improve • Vocal Variety: _o_Enhanced speech __Satisfactory __Could Improve • Organization: _o_Logical flow of ideas __Satisfactory __Should Improve • Word Usage: __Vivid, descriptive, accurate _o_Satisfactory __Could Improve • Body Language: __Natural, expressive _o_Satisfactory __Unnatural, distracting
• What could the speaker have done differently to make the speech more effective?
The visual aids were not fully visible in the video. Also, I could see some fidgeting while standing, which causes some distraction.
• What did you like about the speech? I like the topic and the organization with real life examples. It digs into people’s behavior, of which we can all relate to. The interesting, real-life examples helped the understanding of the topic.
Title: Behavioral Economics
ReplyDeleteEvaluator: Youngho Chun
Date: November 28, 2016
• Topic Selection: __Facilitated vocal variety _o_Satisfactory __Could Improve
• Volume: _o_Excellent __Satisfactory __Too loud or soft
• Rate: _o_Excellent, varied __Satisfactory __Too fast or too slow
• Pitch: __Varied conversational _o_Satisfactory __Monotonous, artificial
• Quality: _o_Pleasant, friendly __Satisfactory __Harsh, monotonous
• Pauses: _o_Appropriate, effective __Satisfactory __Could Improve
• Expressiveness: __Conveyed emotion, meaning _ o _Satisfactory __Could Improve
• Vocal Variety: _o_Enhanced speech __Satisfactory __Could Improve
• Organization: _o_Logical flow of ideas __Satisfactory __Should Improve
• Word Usage: _o_Vivid, descriptive, accurate __Satisfactory __Could Improve
• Body Language: __Natural, expressive _o_Satisfactory __Unnatural, distracting
• What could the speaker have done differently to make the speech more effective?
It would be great if he used more clear visual aids. He used some but it was a little bit boring. Although it contributed to further understanding.
• What did you like about the speech?
I like his material for speech. Some may think it is boring but for me it was beneficial and interesting. By using dramatic visual aids, he can enhance his delivery.
Title: Behavioral Economics
ReplyDeleteEvaluator: Jisu Kim
Date: November 29, 2016
• Topic Selection: __Facilitated vocal variety _o_Satisfactory __Could Improve
• Volume: _o __Excellent _ _Satisfactory __Too loud or soft
• Rate: ___Excellent, varied _o_Satisfactory __Too fast or too slow
• Pitch: __Varied conversational _o_Satisfactory __Monotonous, artificial
• Quality: _o_Pleasant, friendly __Satisfactory __Harsh, monotonous
• Pauses: _o_Appropriate, effective __Satisfactory __Could Improve
• Expressiveness: __Conveyed emotion, meaning _o_Satisfactory __Could Improve
• Vocal Variety: _o_Enhanced speech __Satisfactory __Could Improve
• Organization: _o_Logical flow of ideas __Satisfactory __Should Improve
• Word Usage: _o_Vivid, descriptive, accurate __Satisfactory __Could Improve
• Body Language: __Natural, expressive _o_Satisfactory __Unnatural, distracting
• What could the speaker have done differently to make the speech more effective?
:I think it would be more better if he used more readable visual data. Fonts of characters and size of images were little bit small to read.
• What did you like about the speech?
I think his topic of speech was really good. Behavioral Economics is really interesting field in Economics and also an interesting subject in speech. Lastly, he emphasized why Behavioral Economics is important by showing the way of analysis by traditional Economics in the early phase. I think it was helpful to understand why his topic is important and special.
Title : Behavioral Economics
ReplyDeleteEvaluator : Do Hyun Lim
Date : 16.12.02
• Topic Selection: _o_Facilitated vocal variety __Satisfactory __Could Improve
• Volume: _o_Excellent __Satisfactory __Too loud or soft
• Rate: _o_Excellent, varied __Satisfactory __Too fast or too slow
• Pitch: __Varied conversational _o_Satisfactory __Monotonous, artificial
• Quality: _o_Pleasant, friendly __Satisfactory __Harsh, monotonous
• Pauses: __Appropriate, effective _o_Satisfactory __Could Improve
• Expressiveness: __Conveyed emotion, meaning _o_Satisfactory __Could Improve
• Vocal Variety: _o_Enhanced speech __Satisfactory __Could Improve
• Organization: _o_Logical flow of ideas __Satisfactory __Should Improve
• Word Usage: __Vivid, descriptive, accurate _o_Satisfactory __Could Improve
• Body Language: __Natural, expressive _o_Satisfactory __Unnatural, distracting
• What could the speaker have done differently to make the speech more effective?
The visual aids were not fully visible in the video. Also, I could see some fidgeting while standing, which causes some distraction.
• What did you like about the speech?
I like the topic and the organization with real life examples. It digs into people’s behavior, of which we can all relate to. The interesting, real-life examples helped the understanding of the topic.