Title : 3 Reasons Why We Should Vote Evaluator : Lee Kweonho Date : 16. 11. 29
• Topic Selection: _o_Facilitated vocal variety __Satisfactory __Could Improve • Volume: _o_Excellent __Satisfactory __Too loud or soft • Rate: _o_Excellent, varied __Satisfactory __Too fast or too slow • Pitch: __Varied conversational _o_Satisfactory __Monotonous, artificial • Quality: _o_Pleasant, friendly __Satisfactory __Harsh, monotonous • Pauses: _o_Appropriate, effective __Satisfactory __Could Improve • Expressiveness: __Conveyed emotion, meaning _o_Satisfactory __Could Improve • Vocal Variety: __Enhanced speech _o_Satisfactory __Could Improve • Organization: _o_Logical flow of ideas __Satisfactory __Should Improve • Word Usage: _o_Vivid, descriptive, accurate __Satisfactory __Could Improve • Body Language: __Natural, expressive _o_Satisfactory __Unnatural, distracting
• What could the speaker have done differently to make the speech more effective? Although the presenter had clear idea and logical reasons, the presentation seemed too plain. I was not able to notice much of a vocal variety until the end when the presenter emphasizes “75 percent” by repeating and varying intonation. Varying intonation or volume of the voice would definitely make the speech sound more interesting. Also, I think it would be better for the presenter to convey more emotion as the topic had some persuasive quality at the end.
• What did you like about the speech?
The presenter’s voice volume and speech rate was nice to listen. The delivery of speech was very clear and the presenter didn’t look nervous at all. I especially liked her visual aids and how she organized the materials. Because her PPT slides were simple without many texts, they were easily recognizable. Also, as the presenter summarized her three points in the end, I was able to understand the main points better.
< Vocal Variety Self - Evaluation> Title : 3 Reasons Why We Should Vote Speaker : Sanghee Choi Evaluator : 201303460 Sanghee Choi
• Topic Selection: (o)Facilitated vocal variety __Satisfactory __Could Improve • Volume: (o)Excellent __Satisfactory __Too loud or soft • Rate: __Excellent, varied (o)Satisfactory __Too fast or too slow • Pitch: __Varied conversational __Satisfactory (o)Monotonous, artificial • Quality: __Pleasant, friendly (o)Satisfactory __Harsh, monotonous • Pauses: __Appropriate, effective (o)Satisfactory __Could Improve • Expressiveness: __Conveyed emotion, meaning __Satisfactory (o)Could Improve • Vocal Variety: __Enhanced speech __Satisfactory (o)Could Improve • Organization: (o)Logical flow of ideas __Satisfactory __Should Improve • Word Usage: (o)Vivid, descriptive, accurate __Satisfactory __Could Improve • Body Language: __Natural, expressive (o)Satisfactory __Unnatural, distracting
• What could the speaker have done differently to make the speech more effective? I should have used more vocal variety methods to make my speech more dynamic. I thought I used them to some degree. However, after I watched my video, I realized that I should have exaggerate more to make my speech powerful. This is a persuasive speech and I had some points that I can show my vocal variety methods, but I think I failed to do that. Next time, I should overact and exaggerate more to show those things.
• What did you like about the speech? I think several things were improved compared to my first speech. I practiced my speech more than before, so I felt less nervous than before. Also, I didn't see any notes while I was speaking and I gave the speech in front of the audience.
Title Let the game begin Evaluator Namkoong YooJin Date 12/7 NOTE TO THE EVALUATOR: The speaker is to use a voice that is pleasing to listen to, with proper balance of volume, pitch and rate, and use pauses to enhance his or her message. The speaker's voice should reflect and add meaning to the thoughts he or she is presenting. The speaker is to incorporate lessons learned in previous projects about purpose, organization, word usage and body language. In addition to your verbal evaluation, please complete this evaluation form by checking the appropriate space for each category. Add comments where praise is warranted or where you can offer specific suggestions for improvement. • Topic Selection: _ㅇ_Facilitated vocal variety __Satisfactory __Could Improve • Volume: __Excellent _ㅇ_Satisfactory __Too loud or soft • Rate: __Excellent, varied _ㅇ_Satisfactory __Too fast or too slow • Pitch: _ㅇ_Varied conversational __Satisfactory __Monotonous, artificial • Quality: __Pleasant, friendly _ㅇ_Satisfactory __Harsh, monotonous • Pauses: _ㅇ_Appropriate, effective __Satisfactory __Could Improve • Expressiveness: __Conveyed emotion, meaning _ㅇ_Satisfactory __Could Improve • Vocal Variety: _ㅇ_Enhanced speech __Satisfactory __Could Improve • Organization: _ㅇ_Logical flow of ideas __Satisfactory __Should Improve • Word Usage: _ㅇ_Vivid, descriptive, accurate __Satisfactory __Could Improve • Body Language: __Natural, expressive _ㅇ_Satisfactory __Unnatural, distracting
• What could the speaker have done differently to make the speech more effective? More vocal variety would have made her presentation much better. The speech itself was good, but it was kind of plain. I think she could contain more stress or pauses to draw audiences’ attention.
• What did you like about the speech? I really liked the topic since political participation of Korean students is hot potato these days. It certainly co me that I should vote. I could see that she prepared for the presentation very much.
Title : 3 Reasons Why We Should Vote
ReplyDeleteEvaluator : Lee Kweonho
Date : 16. 11. 29
• Topic Selection: _o_Facilitated vocal variety __Satisfactory __Could Improve
• Volume: _o_Excellent __Satisfactory __Too loud or soft
• Rate: _o_Excellent, varied __Satisfactory __Too fast or too slow
• Pitch: __Varied conversational _o_Satisfactory __Monotonous, artificial
• Quality: _o_Pleasant, friendly __Satisfactory __Harsh, monotonous
• Pauses: _o_Appropriate, effective __Satisfactory __Could Improve
• Expressiveness: __Conveyed emotion, meaning _o_Satisfactory __Could Improve
• Vocal Variety: __Enhanced speech _o_Satisfactory __Could Improve
• Organization: _o_Logical flow of ideas __Satisfactory __Should Improve
• Word Usage: _o_Vivid, descriptive, accurate __Satisfactory __Could Improve
• Body Language: __Natural, expressive _o_Satisfactory __Unnatural, distracting
• What could the speaker have done differently to make the speech more effective?
Although the presenter had clear idea and logical reasons, the presentation seemed too plain. I was not able to notice much of a vocal variety until the end when the presenter emphasizes “75 percent” by repeating and varying intonation. Varying intonation or volume of the voice would definitely make the speech sound more interesting. Also, I think it would be better for the presenter to convey more emotion as the topic had some persuasive quality at the end.
• What did you like about the speech?
The presenter’s voice volume and speech rate was nice to listen. The delivery of speech was very clear and the presenter didn’t look nervous at all. I especially liked her visual aids and how she organized the materials. Because her PPT slides were simple without many texts, they were easily recognizable. Also, as the presenter summarized her three points in the end, I was able to understand the main points better.
201202334 Kweonho Lee
< Vocal Variety Self - Evaluation>
ReplyDeleteTitle : 3 Reasons Why We Should Vote
Speaker : Sanghee Choi
Evaluator : 201303460 Sanghee Choi
• Topic Selection: (o)Facilitated vocal variety __Satisfactory __Could Improve
• Volume: (o)Excellent __Satisfactory __Too loud or soft
• Rate: __Excellent, varied (o)Satisfactory __Too fast or too slow
• Pitch: __Varied conversational __Satisfactory (o)Monotonous, artificial
• Quality: __Pleasant, friendly (o)Satisfactory __Harsh, monotonous
• Pauses: __Appropriate, effective (o)Satisfactory __Could Improve
• Expressiveness: __Conveyed emotion, meaning __Satisfactory (o)Could Improve
• Vocal Variety: __Enhanced speech __Satisfactory (o)Could Improve
• Organization: (o)Logical flow of ideas __Satisfactory __Should Improve
• Word Usage: (o)Vivid, descriptive, accurate __Satisfactory __Could Improve
• Body Language: __Natural, expressive (o)Satisfactory __Unnatural, distracting
• What could the speaker have done differently to make the speech more effective?
I should have used more vocal variety methods to make my speech more dynamic. I thought I used them to some degree. However, after I watched my video, I realized that I should have exaggerate more to make my speech powerful.
This is a persuasive speech and I had some points that I can show my vocal variety methods, but I think I failed to do that. Next time, I should overact and exaggerate more to show those things.
• What did you like about the speech?
I think several things were improved compared to my first speech.
I practiced my speech more than before, so I felt less nervous than before.
Also, I didn't see any notes while I was speaking and I gave the speech in front of the audience.
Title Let the game begin
ReplyDeleteEvaluator Namkoong YooJin Date 12/7
NOTE TO THE EVALUATOR: The speaker is to use a voice that is pleasing to listen to, with proper balance of volume, pitch and rate, and use pauses to enhance his or her message. The speaker's voice should reflect and add meaning to the thoughts he or she is presenting. The speaker is to incorporate lessons learned in previous projects about purpose, organization, word usage and body language. In addition to your verbal evaluation, please complete this evaluation form by checking the appropriate space for each category. Add comments where praise is warranted or where you can offer specific suggestions for improvement.
• Topic Selection: _ㅇ_Facilitated vocal variety __Satisfactory __Could Improve
• Volume: __Excellent _ㅇ_Satisfactory __Too loud or soft
• Rate: __Excellent, varied _ㅇ_Satisfactory __Too fast or too slow
• Pitch: _ㅇ_Varied conversational __Satisfactory __Monotonous, artificial
• Quality: __Pleasant, friendly _ㅇ_Satisfactory __Harsh, monotonous
• Pauses: _ㅇ_Appropriate, effective __Satisfactory __Could Improve
• Expressiveness: __Conveyed emotion, meaning _ㅇ_Satisfactory __Could Improve
• Vocal Variety: _ㅇ_Enhanced speech __Satisfactory __Could Improve
• Organization: _ㅇ_Logical flow of ideas __Satisfactory __Should Improve
• Word Usage: _ㅇ_Vivid, descriptive, accurate __Satisfactory __Could Improve
• Body Language: __Natural, expressive _ㅇ_Satisfactory __Unnatural, distracting
• What could the speaker have done differently to make the speech more effective?
More vocal variety would have made her presentation much better. The speech itself was good, but it was kind of plain. I think she could contain more stress or pauses to draw audiences’ attention.
• What did you like about the speech?
I really liked the topic since political participation of Korean students is hot potato these days. It certainly co me that I should vote. I could see that she prepared for the presentation very much.